Fiscal Decentralization and Devolved Healthcare Service Availability Outcomes in Kenya: Evidence From Panel Dynamic Approach

Authors: Isaiah Maket a,b,* , Remmy Naibei c,d,*

The study examined the effect of fiscal decentralization on healthcare availability outcomes from 23 Kenyan  counties during the 20132022 devolution period. The results from different robust non-endogeneity econometric methods indicate a significant deleterious effect of fiscal decentralization on the availability of human and  technical healthcare resources (number of medical personnel and number of hospital beds per 10,000 people).  The study also reveals the significant beneficial role of county gross domestic product in enhancing the avail ability of healthcare resources. Nevertheless, the paper demonstrates that county revenue impedes realizing  adequate availability of healthcare resources in Kenyan counties. The study results point to the need to implement proactive decentralized fiscal policy interventions to realize an efficient healthcare system where human  and technical healthcare resources are available. Specifically, enacting policy interventions that target effective  financial allocation toward infrastructural development and building human resource capacity could enhance  overall healthcare availability at the grassroots level. 

Over recent decades, FD has been operationalized by several economies in the form of devolution, becoming an integral component in  public sector reforms (Manor, 1999; Cavalieri and Ferrante, 2016). In  this broader process, healthcare services have occupied a pivotal position (Costa-Font and Greer, 2016). In general, the devolution of  healthcare functions to the lower cadre of governance occurs under  diverse forms. For example, there are National Health Service systems in  Scandinavian countries, the United Kingdom, Spain, and Italy; those for  federal states in countries such as Australia, Canada, and Switzerland;  and those for counties/administrative provinces in developing nations  such as Kenya, Tanzania, China, India, and the Philippines (Cavalieri  and Ferrante, 2016). Although intriguing reasons for devolution and  decentralization are fully country-specific, the overall persuasion is that  transfers of functions, responsibilities, and powers to the regional government can enable an ideal match between peoples priorities and state  policies (Oates, 1972). In other words, such actions are entrenched in  the inherent rationale of improving welfare mobility (Weingast, 2009;  Zhang and Hewings, 2018). 

FULL ARTICLE